Exclusive SALE Offer Today

Which Two Statements Describe the Two Configuration Models for Cisco IOS Firewalls? (Choose Two.) – Exam Guide

09 Apr 2025 Cisco
Which Two Statements Describe the Two Configuration Models for Cisco IOS Firewalls? (Choose Two.) – Exam Guide

Introduction

In the ever-evolving field of cybersecurity, firewalls stand as the first line of defense for any network infrastructure. With network security threats increasing both in volume and complexity, enterprises must equip their systems with robust protection mechanisms. Cisco, a global leader in networking technologies, provides flexible firewall solutions that operate within its widely used IOS (Internetwork Operating System). One of the fundamental aspects of managing Cisco firewalls is understanding the different configuration models available for Cisco IOS firewalls. The keyword we’re addressing“in which two statements describe the two configuration models for Cisco IOS firewalls? (choose two.)”reflects an important concept tested in several Cisco certification exams, including those on security and enterprise networking. This blog post, created by DumpsQueen, will offer a deep dive into the two primary configuration models, how they function, their characteristics, and where they are typically used. We’ll also highlight the distinctions between them and offer insights that help IT professionals and exam candidates solidify their understanding of these firewall models.

The Significance of Cisco IOS Firewalls

Cisco IOS firewalls are built directly into routers, allowing network administrators to enforce security policies at various layers of the OSI model without needing a separate appliance. This integration is ideal for branch offices and organizations that want to secure network traffic while keeping infrastructure streamlined. The IOS firewall supports a wide range of features, including packet filtering, stateful inspection, zone-based policy enforcement, and deep packet inspection. But configuring these firewalls correctly is crucial. That’s where understanding the two configuration models comes into play. These models define how rules are applied, how traffic is managed, and how administrative tasks are carried out.

What Are the Two Configuration Models for Cisco IOS Firewalls?

The two configuration models used in Cisco IOS firewalls are:

  1. Classic Firewall (CBAC – Context-Based Access Control)

  2. Zone-Based Policy Firewall (ZPF)

These two models are not just theoretical they are the actual modes that determine how traffic inspection, rule enforcement, and network segmentation are handled. Each model serves different operational needs, and understanding their behavior is critical for both real-world application and success in Cisco certification exams. Let’s explore both models in detail.

The Classic Firewall Model (CBAC)

The Classic Firewall, more formally known as CBAC (Context-Based Access Control), was the traditional method of implementing firewall functionality within Cisco IOS before the Zone-Based Policy Firewall was introduced. It is based on access control lists (ACLs) that are enhanced with dynamic inspection capabilities. CBAC goes beyond static filtering by tracking the state of active connections and permitting return traffic for legitimate sessions. CBAC inspects traffic at the application layer and dynamically creates entries in access lists to allow return traffic from established sessions. It can inspect protocols such as HTTP, FTP, SMTP, and others. The primary advantage of CBAC lies in its simplicity and compatibility with older IOS versions. CBAC uses inspect rules applied to traffic interfaces to define what kind of traffic is considered safe and should be permitted. When a packet enters a router, the firewall inspects it and determines if it matches a session initiated by an internal user. If yes, it allows the packet; if not, it blocks it by default. However, CBAC lacks a clearly defined policy structure and can become complicated to manage as networks grow. Moreover, as it relies heavily on interfaces, it may be less intuitive when configuring complex topologies.

The Zone-Based Policy Firewall (ZPF)

The Zone-Based Policy Firewall (ZPF or ZBF) was introduced to overcome the limitations of CBAC. This newer model provides a more scalable, flexible, and policy-driven approach to firewall configuration. ZPF replaces interface-based inspection with zone-based segmentation, where interfaces are assigned to zones and policies are applied between those zones. ZPF divides a network into different logical areas or zones, such as inside, outside, and demilitarized zones (DMZ). Administrators then define security policies that govern traffic between these zones. Unlike CBAC, which applies inspection directly to interfaces, ZPF allows for a centralized policy model, making the firewall rules easier to understand, audit, and maintain. Traffic between zones is denied by default unless explicitly permitted by a policy. This default-deny model aligns with best practices in network security. ZPF supports class-based policy language (CPL), allowing for granular inspection and control of traffic based on match criteria like protocol, port, or IP address. ZPF is the preferred method in modern Cisco deployments because of its flexibility and robustness. It integrates better with other security features like intrusion prevention and VPNs, making it suitable for medium to large enterprise environments.

Comparing CBAC and ZPF

Though both CBAC and ZPF serve the purpose of inspecting and controlling traffic on Cisco routers, they operate in fundamentally different ways. CBAC is interface-based and procedural, while ZPF is zone-based and policy-oriented. The primary goal of both models is to provide stateful packet inspection and enforce security rules, but they vary in their implementation, management complexity, and scalability. CBAC is useful for smaller networks with simple topologies or legacy devices that do not support the more advanced ZPF model. ZPF, on the other hand, is suited for modern networks where flexibility, scalability, and centralized policy management are necessary. In Cisco exams, questions such as “in which two statements describe the two configuration models for Cisco IOS firewalls? (choose two.)” are intended to evaluate a candidate’s ability to differentiate between these two models and apply their understanding in simulated or real-world configurations.

Practical Use Cases

Understanding where each firewall model fits best can significantly enhance your ability to design secure networks. For example, in a small office setup with a single WAN link and minimal internal segmentation, CBAC may be sufficient. It is easier to configure in simple scenarios and gets the job done without much overhead. In contrast, a mid-sized enterprise network with multiple departments, servers, and external partners would benefit from ZPF. Here, different zones can be created for various departments (HR, Finance, IT) and strict policies can control inter-zone traffic based on roles and responsibilities. Cisco IOS firewall configurations are not one-size-fits-all. Choosing the right model depends on network architecture, performance needs, and security requirements.

Cisco Exam Relevance and DumpsQueen Advantage

At DumpsQueen, we specialize in providing top-tier preparation materials for Cisco certifications. If you're preparing for exams such as Cisco CCNA Security, CCNP Security, or even the newer Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR 350-701), understanding the differences between CBAC and ZPF is essential. Our practice dumps, simulations, and explanations cover scenarios related to firewall configurations, including the keyword “in which two statements describe the two configuration models for Cisco IOS firewalls? (choose two.)” This kind of question directly tests your grasp of both theoretical and applied knowledge of firewall models.

Real-World Configuration Scenarios

CBAC Example

ip inspect name INSPECT_RULE http

ip inspect name INSPECT_RULE ftp

interface FastEthernet0/0

 ip inspect INSPECT_RULE in

This basic CBAC configuration enables inspection on HTTP and FTP traffic coming into the interface. Dynamic rules will be created to allow return traffic.

ZPF Example

zone security INSIDE

zone security OUTSIDE

zone-pair security INSIDE-TO-OUTSIDE source INSIDE destination OUTSIDE

 service-policy type inspect POLICY_INSIDE_TO_OUTSIDE

class-map type inspect match-any CLASS_HTTP

 match protocol http

policy-map type inspect POLICY_INSIDE_TO_OUTSIDE

 class type inspect CLASS_HTTP

  inspect

This example defines zones, zone-pairs, class maps, and policy maps to allow HTTP traffic from the INSIDE zone to the OUTSIDE zone.

Free Sample Questions

Question 1: In which two statements describe the two configuration models for Cisco IOS firewalls? (Choose two.)
A. The Classic Firewall model uses zones to enforce security.
B. CBAC is based on interface-level traffic inspection.
C. ZPF applies inspection rules directly to interfaces.
D. ZPF allows centralized policy creation between zones.
Answer: B and D

Question 2: Which Cisco IOS firewall model allows interfaces to be grouped into security zones for policy enforcement?
A. CBAC
B. Reflexive ACL
C. ZPF
D. Static NAT
Answer: C

Question 3: What is the default behavior of a Zone-Based Policy Firewall regarding inter-zone traffic?
A. All traffic is permitted by default.
B. All traffic is denied unless explicitly allowed.
C. All traffic is encrypted.
D. Only FTP and HTTP traffic are allowed by default.
Answer: B

Question 4: Which model is more scalable and suited for complex network environments?
A. CBAC
B. ZPF
C. Extended ACL
D. Static Inspection
Answer: B

Conclusion

Cisco IOS firewalls play a vital role in protecting network infrastructure, and the two primary configuration models CBAC and ZPF offer distinct approaches to achieving this. CBAC, the classic model, provides basic stateful inspection on a per-interface basis, suitable for simpler environments. In contrast, the Zone-Based Policy Firewall offers advanced capabilities with a scalable, policy-driven structure. Understanding these two models and how they differ is not only essential for passing Cisco certification exams but also for designing effective, secure networks in the real world. With the help of DumpsQueen, candidates can access premium study materials that demystify topics like these and boost their confidence before entering the exam room. Whether you're an aspiring network engineer or an experienced professional brushing up your skills, grasping the keyword “in which two statements describe the two configuration models for Cisco IOS firewalls? (choose two.)” is a crucial step toward mastering Cisco security.

Limited-Time Offer: Get an Exclusive Discount on the 350-701 EXAM DUMPS – Order Now!

Hot Exams

How to Open Test Engine .dumpsqueen Files

Use FREE DumpsQueen Test Engine player to open .dumpsqueen files

DumpsQueen Test Engine

Windows

 safe checkout

Your purchase with DumpsQueen.com is safe and fast.

The DumpsQueen.com website is protected by 256-bit SSL from Cloudflare, the leader in online security.

Need Help Assistance?